The new framework ASP.NET Core is lighter and more portable than MVC. It helps create Windows, macOS, Linux, and other compatible internet apps.Thanks to an active developer community and extensive documentation, MVC will still be a strong choice for developers who don't have to worry about deploying on non-Windows devices, and ultimately may be a sound choice for developers who would rather wait for ASP.NET Core to mature before migrating.ASP.NET MVC is not outdated per se. It's still a competent . NET framework. But we recommend avoiding it for new projects, as it is discontinued.

What is the alternative to system web MVC : The best alternative to ASP . NET MVC is the ASP . NET Core framework, which is an open-source, cross-platform framework for building modern web applications.

Is .NET MVC still relevant

MVC is an old pattern, but it's still relevant to web apps. From a user's perspective, a software application, whether it's mobile, desktop, or web based, is something that you interact with and it does stuff.

What is better than MVC : The best alternative to ASP . NET MVC is the ASP . NET Core framework, which is an open-source, cross-platform framework for building modern web applications. ASP.NET Core runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a more flexible and versatile framework than ASP.NET MVC, which only runs on the Windows platform.

MVC is an old pattern, but it's still relevant to web apps. From a user's perspective, a software application, whether it's mobile, desktop, or web based, is something that you interact with and it does stuff.

The short answer is no, Blazor is not Better than MVC. It's a new technology for a new type of application, and not intended to replace ASP.NET MVC. If you want to build a single-page-application or SPA like experience, and only write with . NET languages like C#, then Blazor is the technology you need.

Why MVVM instead of MVC

Better support for multiple developers: Because the MVVM pattern allows for a cleaner separation of concerns between the different layers of the application, it can be easier for multiple developers to work on different parts of the codebase concurrently.The MVP architecture is more flexible than the MVC architecture. The presenter component can be easily swapped out for a different implementation when needed. This means that changes made to the model or the view will not affect the presenter and vice versa.Choose Blazor If: You prefer a unified development experience, want to leverage your C# expertise, and prioritize the modularity of components. Choose MVC If: You value stability, need fine-grained control over your frontend, and appreciate the extensive resources available for this well-established framework.

MVVM Toolkit

This is the same MVVM library used by the Microsoft Store, the Photos app, and more! The MVVM Toolkit is inspired by MvvmLight, and is also the official replacement for it now that the library has been deprecated.

Why .NET Core is better than MVC : Performance: ASP.NET Core is known for its improved performance, high-speed processing, and efficient memory usage compared to ASP.NET MVC. Dependency Injection: ASP.NET Core provides built-in support for dependency injection, enabling better control over application dependencies and making the code more testable.

Why is MVVM so hard : One of the main reasons why developers may find MVVM complicated is that it requires a significant shift in thinking. Traditionally, developers have used a Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture for building user interfaces. MVC is a simpler pattern to understand, and developers may feel comfortable using it.

Why MVVM is better than Viper

MVVM generally produces much less code due to its not-so-clear separation of concerns and can avoid some overhead created by VIPER. Your code will definitely be easier to write, and still be easy to test and maintain.

ASP.NET is based on the event-driven model, while ASP.NET MVC is based on the request-response model. This means that ASP.NET is best suited for applications that require a high degree of interactivity, while ASP.NET MVC is better for applications that require a more modular and scalable architecture.MVC works well with apps with many dynamic server views, single-page apps, REST APIs, and AJAX calls. Razor Pages are perfect for simple pages that are read-only or do basic data input. MVC has been all the rage recently for web applications across most programming languages. It definitely has its pros and cons.

Is MVVM better than MVC : Testability. MVC provides good testability, particularly with unit testing the Model and Controller components. However, testing the View can be challenging due to its tight coupling with the Controller. MVVM enhances testability with better separation of concerns.